Ability Grouping Stereotypes
Over and over again in research conducted about ability grouping the reference of teacher's preconceived stereotypes about students. Students are placed into selected ability groups based on behavior, gender, age, and unwarranted perception. Research has shown us that actual fair data or lack of is over looked when students are placed in ability groups. Teachers must become aware of their bias and not let them dictate the ability of a student. Personal instinct should not be thrown out of the equation when evaluating students. Teacher experience and training should never be overlooked. However, students must be given ample amount of time to prove their capability. Student progress must be recognized if a remedial group and allowed to change the ability group if warranted. Research has shown ways to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...In order to close the gap curriculum being instructed needs to be similar and equal. A remedial class is meant to catch up a student academically. However they cannot be expected to succeed in a general or honors course if they lack the same basic content that is being taught in those courses. Students regardless of ability group should receive the same quality and level of instruction and content. Ability grouping is meant to differentiate instruction, not give more content to one student and not to the other. In the literature review it was mentioned that schools are going to an open course enrollment. This allows students and parents to decide if they want to enroll in honors or advance placement level course. Students are still to meet prerequisites for the course but are no longer susceptible to teacher bias, or past academic performance. Open course enrollment allows students the chance to break the academic track they were on and jump onto a track that allows them to take courses that gets them college
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
No comments:
Post a Comment