Abolishment Of Sweatshops In The United States

Abolishment Of Sweatshops In The United States

largely beneficial in the lives of the working people. While workers in sweatshops are extremely willing to work in sweatshops, individuals in western nations often advocate for the abolishment of sweatshops. Individuals in the west who argue against sweatshops are often arguing for the interest of dominant groups in society. Arguing against developing countries trying to build their living standards and happiness through low wage production and manufacturing, is actually individuals and groups wanting jobs to stay in the wealthy nations instead of being sent off to low cost nations (Spath, 2002, pg. 125). Advocating for the abolishment of sweatshops is placing a barrier on an individual's right to work (Danaher & Henderson, 2001, pg. 128). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...Real–life examples would be campuses across the United States, and individual municipalities across Canada advocating against sweatshops, and advocating for sweat–free goods. Student activists in universities in the United States have started to disallow purchasing university merchandise from factories that don't respect worker's rights. This push is coming from the United Students Against Sweatshops, who have over the years organized strikes, rallies, and charity events to demand that American universities make stronger policies to disallow clothing for students to come from sweatshops. Pressure from students have made numerous universities support this cause. Furthermore, students have demanded that popular clothing brands like Nike disclose which factories are used to make university merchandise, and Nike did give the locations and names of its factories to the organization. Nike also promised to make sweatshop conditions better. This is an example of how student organizations are getting major companies to improve the conditions in sweatshops, and how major organizations share the view that sweatshops are extremely bad for worker's economic and social human rights. Student organizations in universities are also making companies pay their workers more in order for them to meet the living wage. While this does make prices for merchandise higher, it has a minimal impact on the consumer and a huge impact on the worker. In this way students are improving the lives of many sweatshop workers around the world (Dreier & Appelbaum, 2006, pg. 122). Another example would be that for years Ottawa has been trying to ensure that goods purchased by the city are not from sweatshops, and meet universal labour and environmental standards. Ottawa is becoming among

... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...