Affluenza Case Study Psychology
Affluenza: From the Utilitarian Approach and the Moral Brain In society, there are always going to be different opinions and controversial topics that cannot be avoided. Morality is one of these topics because there will never be a solid answer to whether or not something is moral due to everyone having their own perspectives. Morality can be defined in many different ways. The Utilitarian approach and neuroscience are two of the many ways morality can be thought of. A case study from the 2015 National Ethics Bowl exemplifies how one situation can be thought of in many different ways. A case on affluenza is able to be thought of in two different perspectives, by both utilitarianism and by neuroscience. In case number fourteen from the "2015 National Cases" Ethics Bowl, it discusses how ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...The "course of conduct [should] promote the greatest amount of happiness for all those who will be affected" (Rachels 93). If Ethan were to be sentenced to jail, it would make the most people happy in this situation and it would also be the right thing to do. Couch was responsible for the deaths of four people in this accident and many people in his town are upset by this because their family or friends have been affected. Utilitarianism "judge[s] actions right or wrong depending on whether they cause more happiness or unhappiness" (Rachels 100). For the victims, families, and bystanders involved in this accident, they would be happier if Couch gave his time and was sentenced to ten years in jail for his actions since they lost loved ones due to his stupidity and ignorance. Many bystanders and the jury of the case thought Couch deserved a stricter, harsher punishment than what he received. According to utilitarianism, Couch should not have gotten the easy way out of this situation with probation and rehabilitation. The only way Couch would be sentenced to jail was if he failed to obey his
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
No comments:
Post a Comment