Analysis Of The Film ' The ' An Inconvenient Truth '
em{An Inconvenient Truth }em is a documentary film directed by Davis Guggenheim about the endeavor of Al Gore, former United States vice president, to convince the audience that global warming is a severe problem that has influenced the environment and the way humans lived. The film combines apocalyptic rhetoric with other environment rhetorics, including scientific rhetoric, utilitarian rhetoric and aesthetic rhetoric, to persuades the audience apocalyptically that unavoidable and irreparable environment problems will occur and gives the audience a feeling of powerlessness. And the film, at the same time, tempers apocalypticism to encourage audiences to confront the global warming and to convince audiences that they have the ability to help solving the problem.
hskip 3em
The film uses apocalyptic rhetoric and scientific rhetoric. According to the description in Laura Johnson 's rhetoric review, scientific rhetoric involves statistics and processes, often using charts, graphs, and the photographs to illustrate data (Johnson 32), and apocalyptic rhetoric gestures in some way toward future disaster (Johnson 33). To show that the global warming has great influence on shifts in seasons, Al Gore 's slides cited a diagram of a study from the Netherlands about active periods of birds and caterpillars (An Inconvenient Truth 51:45). This logo warns the audience to notice the fact that the global warming has affected ecological niches and let the audience imagine that more and more
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...
No comments:
Post a Comment